Our NCP-US-6.5 valid study guide is edited by out IT professional experts and focus on providing you with the most updated study material for all of you. You will pass your NCP-US-6.5 actual test in your first attempt. With the help of Nutanix NCP-US-6.5 Current Exam Content, you will be more confident and positive to face your coming test. After you get your NCP-US-6.5 certification, you will be getting close to your dream.
After you purchase our NCP-US-6.5 exam guide is you can download the test bank you have bought immediately. You only need 20-30 hours to learn and prepare for the exam, because it is enough for you to grasp all content of our study materials, and the passing rate is very high and about 98%-100%. Our laTest NCP-US-6.5 Quiz torrent provides 3 versions and you can choose the most suitable one for you to learn. All in all, there are many merits of our NCP-US-6.5 quiz prep.
>> Reliable NCP-US-6.5 Test Cost <<
With the intense competition in labor market, it has become a trend that a lot of people, including many students, workers and so on, are trying their best to get a NCP-US-6.5 certification in a short time. They all long to own the useful certification that they can have an opportunity to change their present state, but they also understand that it is not easy for them to get a NCP-US-6.5 Certification in a short time. If you are the one of the people who wants to pass the NCP-US-6.5 exam and get the certificate, we are willing to help you solve your problem with our wonderful NCP-US-6.5 study guide.
Topic | Details |
---|---|
Topic 1 |
|
Topic 2 |
|
Topic 3 |
|
Topic 4 |
|
Topic 5 |
|
Topic 6 |
|
Topic 7 |
|
Topic 8 |
|
Topic 9 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 114
An administrator needs to allow individual users to restore files and folders hosted in Files.
How can the administrator meet this requirement?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Self-Service Restore (SSR) is a feature that allows individual users to restore files and folders hosted in Files without requiring administrator intervention. SSR can be enabled on a per-share or per-export basis, and users can access the snapshots of their data through a web portal or a Windows client application1. Reference: Nutanix Files Administration Guide1
NEW QUESTION # 115
An administrator has received an alert A130357 - VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC with the following details:
* Block Serial Number: 16Suxxxxxxxx
* Alert Time: Thu Jan 19 2023 20:31:10 GMT-0800 (PST)
* Alert Type: VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC
* Alert Message: A130357:VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC
* Cluster ID: xxxxx
* Alert Body: Volume Group protection failed on PCWhich two conditions need to be addressed to allow successful protection of the Volume Group? (Choose two.)
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
The alert A130357 - VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC in a Nutanix environment indicates a failure to protect a Volume Group (VG) in a Protection Domain (PD) managed through Prism Central (PC). Nutanix Volumes, part of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), provides block storage via iSCSI, and Volume Groups can be protected using Protection Domains for snapshots and replication. The alert suggests that the protection process failed, likely due to incompatible configurations.
Understanding the Issue:
* Volume Group Protection: A Volume Group in Nutanix Volumes can be added to a Protection Domain in Prism Central for data protection (e.g., snapshots, replication).
* Protection Failed on PC: The failure occurred during the protection process, managed through Prism Central, indicating an issue with the Protection Domain or policy settings.
* Conditions to Address: The failure is likely due to configuration mismatches or unsupported settings in the Protection Domain or policy.
Analysis of Conditions:
* Option A (Volume Group is protected in a legacy protection domain): Correct. A "legacy protection domain" refers to an older protection mechanism in Nutanix (e.g., from earlier AOS versions) that may not be fully compatible with newer Prism Central features or Volume Group protection workflows. If the Volume Group is part of a legacy PD, the protection process may fail due to deprecated features or APIs. Addressing this involves migrating the Volume Group to a modern Protection Domain in Prism Central, ensuring compatibility.
* Option B (The Protection Policy applied on Volume Group has an Async snapshot schedule applied): Incorrect. An Async (asynchronous) snapshot schedule is a standard and supported configuration for Volume Group protection in a Protection Domain. Async schedules take snapshots at intervals (e.g., hourly, daily) and replicate them to a remote site, and this does not cause protection failures-it's a valid setup.
* Option C (The Protection Policy applied on Volume Group has a NearSync snapshot schedule applied): Correct. NearSync is a near-synchronous replication schedule (e.g., 1-minute RPO, as in Question 24) that is supported for VMs and some Nutanix Files configurations, but it is not supported for Volume Groups in a Protection Domain. If a NearSync schedule is applied to a Volume Group's Protection Policy, the protection will fail because Volume Groups only support Async schedules.
Addressing this involves changing the schedule to an Async policy, which is compatible with Volume Groups.
* Option D (Volume Group is not protected in a legacy protection domain): Incorrect. This option suggests that the Volume Group is already in a modern (non-legacy) Protection Domain, which would not cause the failure. The issue lies in specific conditions (e.g., legacy PD or incompatible schedule), so this option does not identify a condition that needs addressing.
Selected Conditions:
* A: A legacy Protection Domain can cause compatibility issues, leading to protection failures. Migrating to a modern PD in Prism Central resolves this.
* C: A NearSync schedule is not supported for Volume Groups, causing the protection to fail. Switching to an Async schedule ensures compatibility.
Why These Conditions?
* Legacy Protection Domain (A): Legacy PDs may use outdated mechanisms that are incompatible with Prism Central's modern protection workflows for Volume Groups, causing failures.
* NearSync Schedule (C): Volume Groups in a Protection Domain only support Async snapshot schedules. A NearSync schedule, designed for low-RPO replication, is not supported and will cause the protection process to fail.
Exact Extract from Nutanix Documentation:
From the Nutanix Prism Alerts Reference Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"Alert A130357 - VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC: This alert is triggered when Volume Group protection fails in a Protection Domain managed through Prism Central. Common causes include:
* The Volume Group is protected in a legacy protection domain, which is not fully compatible with modern Prism Central workflows. Migrate the Volume Group to a modern Protection Domain.
* The Protection Policy applied to the Volume Group has a NearSync snapshot schedule, which is not supported for Volume Groups. Change the schedule to an Async policy to allow successful protection."
:
Nutanix Prism Alerts Reference Guide, Version 6.0, Section: "Alert A130357 - VolumeGroupProtectionFailedOnPC" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Volumes Administration Guide, Version 6.0, Section: "Protecting Volume Groups with Protection Domains" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) Study Guide, Section: "Nutanix Volumes Data Protection".
NEW QUESTION # 116
An organization currently has a Files cluster for their office data including all department shares. Most of the data is considered cold Data and they are looking to migrate to free up space for future growth or newer data.
The organization has recently added an additional node with more storage. In addition, the organization is using the Public Cloud for .. storage needs.
What will be the best way to achieve this requirement?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The organization uses a Nutanix Files cluster, part of Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), for back office data, with most data classified as Cold Data (infrequently accessed). They want to free up space on the Files cluster for future growth or newer data. They have added a new node with more storage to the cluster and are already using the Public Cloud for other storage needs. The goal is to migrate Cold Data to free up space while considering the best approach.
Analysis of Options:
* Option A (Set up another cluster and replicate the data with Protection Domain): Incorrect.
Setting up another cluster and using a Protection Domain to replicate data is a disaster recovery (DR) strategy, not a solution for migrating Cold Data to free up space. Protection Domains are used to protect and replicate VMs or Volume Groups, not Files shares directly, and this approach would not address the goal of freeing up space on the existing Files cluster-it would simply create a copy on another cluster.
* Option B (Enable Smart Tiering in Files within the Files Console): Correct. Nutanix Files supports Smart Tiering, a feature that allows data to be tiered to external storage, such as the Public Cloud (e.g., AWS S3, Azure Blob), based on access patterns. Cold Data (infrequently accessed) can be automatically tiered to the cloud, freeing up space on the Files cluster while keeping the data accessible through the same share. Since the organization is already using the Public Cloud, Smart Tiering aligns perfectly with their infrastructure and requirements.
* Option C (Migrate cold data from Files to tape storage): Incorrect. Migrating data to tape storage is a manual and outdated process for archival. Nutanix Files does not have native integration with tape storage, and this approach would require significant manual effort, making it less efficient than Smart Tiering. Additionally, tape storage is not as easily accessible as cloud storage for future retrieval.
* Option D (Back up the data using a third-party software and replicate to the cloud): Incorrect.
While backing up data with third-party software and replicating it to the cloud is feasible, it is not the best approach for this scenario. This method would create a backup copy rather than freeing up space on the Files cluster, and it requires additional software and management overhead. Smart Tiering is a native feature that achieves the goal more efficiently by moving Cold Data to the cloud while keeping it accessible.
Why Option B?
Smart Tiering in Nutanix Files is designed for exactly this use case: moving Cold Data to a lower-cost storage tier (e.g., Public Cloud) to free up space on the primary cluster while maintaining seamless access to the data.
Since the organization is already using the Public Cloud and has added a new node (which increases local capacity but doesn't address Cold Data directly), Smart Tiering leverages their existing cloud infrastructure to offload Cold Data, freeing up space for future growth or newer data. This can be configured in the Files Console by enabling Smart Tiering and setting policies to tier Cold Data to the cloud.
Exact Extract from Nutanix Documentation:
From the Nutanix Files Administration Guide (available on the Nutanix Portal):
"Smart Tiering in Nutanix Files allows administrators to tier Cold Data to external storage, such as AWS S3 or Azure Blob, to free up space on the primary Files cluster. This feature can be enabled in the Files Console, where policies can be configured to identify and tier infrequently accessed data while keeping it accessible through the same share."
:
Nutanix Files Administration Guide, Version 4.0, Section: "Smart Tiering in Nutanix Files" (Nutanix Portal).
Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) Study Guide, Section: "Nutanix Files Data Management Features".
NEW QUESTION # 117
What best describes the data protection illustrated in the exhibit?
Answer: B
Explanation:
The data protection illustrated in the exhibit is Smart DR. Smart DR is a feature that allows share-level replication between active file server instances for disaster recovery. Smart DR can replicate shares from a primary FSI to one or more recovery FSIs on different clusters or sites. Smart DR can also perform failover and failback operations in case of a disaster or planned maintenance. The exhibit shows a Smart DR configuration with one primary FSI and two recovery FSIs. Reference: Nutanix Files Administration Guide, page 79; Nutanix Files Solution Guide, page 9
NEW QUESTION # 118
Life Cycle manager must the compatible versions of which two components before installing or upgrading Files? (Choose two.)
Answer: A
Explanation:
Before installing or upgrading Files, Life Cycle Manager (LCM) must check the compatibility versions of Nutanix Cluster Check (NCC) and Acropolis Operating System (AOS). NCC is a framework of scripts that helps diagnose cluster health, and AOS is the core operating system that runs on each node in a Nutanix cluster. LCM will not proceed with the installation or upgrade if NCC or AOS versions are incompatible with Files. Reference: Nutanix Files Administration Guide, Nutanix Cluster Check Guide
NEW QUESTION # 119
......
Nutanix exam simulation software is the best offline method to boost preparation for the Nutanix NCP-US-6.5 examination. The software creates a NCP-US-6.5 real practice test-like scenario where aspirants face actual NCP-US-6.5 exam questions. This feature creates awareness among users about Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US) v6.5 exam pattern and syllabus. With the desktop Nutanix NCP-US-6.5 Practice Exam software, you can practice for the test offline via any Windows-based computer.
NCP-US-6.5 PDF: https://www.passleader.top/Nutanix/NCP-US-6.5-exam-braindumps.html